Google clarifies Ghost Mannequin Effect

Description of your first forum.
Post Reply
naim@
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2022 4:46 am

Google clarifies Ghost Mannequin Effect

Post by naim@ »

In a central Google Webmaster Hangout, John Mueller offers helpful Ghost Mannequin Effect advice on the proper use of Schema.org structured data, notes the differences between the options available on Schema.org and what Google uses for display purposes , then ends with an interesting statement about how Google could use structured data to better understand entities. Can we use too much structured data? There are several ways to use Schema.org markup to communicate information about physical businesses and their locations. As long as they validate and contain all the information that Google currently uses, you're fine. And if you go beyond Ghost Mannequin Effect what Google uses, that's fine too. “So sometimes there are different ways of doing the same thing. Sometimes there's Schema.org markup that we like to accept but we don't use it for anything in search and obviously the validator will say "Oh that's good...""

This is really useful information because Schema.org provides a way to Ghost Mannequin Effect communicate a lot of information on a website and if you copy the way other companies do it you may end up providing more information than you need. Hangout Central for Google Webmasters Trust Google Schema Developers Page If your concern is how Google uses schema markup, then the ultimate authority for schema markup is Google, not Schema.org. Structured data from Schema.org has more options than those used at Google for display purposes. Google does not use anything specified on Schema.org. Here is what he said: Advertising Continue reading Ghost Mannequin Effect below "I recommend looking at the search developer documentation and choosing from the types there that are actually relevant to your individual pages."

Mueller says it depends on the ROI of how you use your time, whether Ghost Mannequin Effect what you put into it outweighs the benefits on the other end of Google, whether what you code is superfluous and won't show up in the SERPs from Google. “If you're limited by the time you have, you don't like to just take all your pages and tag all the features. You have to somehow focus on what actually brings you value. So it's one thing that we don't mind if people mark more on their pages than what we show directly in search results, but that's not the case where you'll see like a really clear reaction based on that . " Google clarifies how good enough structured data is Schema.org as a quality factor? Mueller offered clarification on adding data that may not be used for display purposes, in response to a follow-up Ghost Mannequin Effect question asking for clarification. The question asked to clarify if adding more information than what will appear in the SERPs can serve another SEO purpose or if it does not appear in the SERPs, it is a waste of time. Here is the question: Advertising Continue reading below "So if you have Schema markup.
Post Reply